<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simple Syrup? Screw That Sh@t! Inverted Sugar!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swankpad.org/blather/2007/10/30/simple-sypur-screw-that-sht-inverted-sugar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swankpad.org/blather/2007/10/30/simple-sypur-screw-that-sht-inverted-sugar/</link>
	<description>If it's Swank...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Swanky</title>
		<link>http://www.swankpad.org/blather/2007/10/30/simple-sypur-screw-that-sht-inverted-sugar/#comment-46303</link>
		<dc:creator>Swanky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 02:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swankpad.org/blather/2007/10/30/simple-sypur-screw-that-sht-inverted-sugar/#comment-46303</guid>
		<description>I don't think it matters, but I just went with uncovered. It's not much of a boil as it simmers, so it won't render down much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it matters, but I just went with uncovered. It&#8217;s not much of a boil as it simmers, so it won&#8217;t render down much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rupe</title>
		<link>http://www.swankpad.org/blather/2007/10/30/simple-sypur-screw-that-sht-inverted-sugar/#comment-46302</link>
		<dc:creator>rupe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swankpad.org/blather/2007/10/30/simple-sypur-screw-that-sht-inverted-sugar/#comment-46302</guid>
		<description>Question 0n this - should you simmer covered or uncovered?
Am dying to try it and have had the page bookmarked to remind me!

thanks!
~Rupe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question 0n this - should you simmer covered or uncovered?<br />
Am dying to try it and have had the page bookmarked to remind me!</p>
<p>thanks!<br />
~Rupe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
